Working Money magazine.  The investors' magazine.
Traders.com Advantage

INDICATORS LIST


LIST OF TOPICS





Article Archive | Search | Subscribe/Renew | Login | Free Trial | Forgot ID?


PRINT THIS ARTICLE

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS


Transports' Baby, Industrials Maybe

07/20/01 01:52:24 PM
by David Penn

Does old-fashioned Dow Theory anticipate a test of the May highs for the Dow Industrials?

Security:   .DJI, .DJT
Position:   N/A

Of all the components of Dow Theory, the notion that the "averages must confirm" is probably the most touted as indicative of the applicability (or lack thereof) of traditional Dow Theory to modern markets. By "averages", the Dow Theory suggests that the Dow Industrials Average and the Dow Transportation Average must move, more or less, in tandem. For example, if the transports make a relative new high, then the industrials are expected to make a relative new high. When the averages fail to confirm each other-- for example, when the transports make a new relative low and the industrials hold their ground--a warning signal is sounding that a major market shift may be soon in coming.

The logic behind the rationale of the Dow Theory is simple: in a healthy economy, the demand for industrial goods is matched by the need to transport them to customers. Thus, when the industrials are down, the transports are expected to be down as well, and vice versa. The failure to confirm, or the "divergence", when it occurs is indicative that something in this basic equation has gone wrong and the health of the market--in the short term--has become a bit more suspect.

Figure 1: The Averages Must Confirm ... But does Dow Theory anticipate breakout or resistance failure?
Graphic provided by: MetaStock.
 
The most common criticism against this part of Dow Theory is that the transports average was originally based on the railroad average, and that the relationship between today's transports (which include airlines and overnight courier services such as FedEx) and today's industrials is vastly different from the relationship between yesterday's transports and industrials. While this may be the case fundamentally speaking, market technicians have continued to exploit the relationship between the transports and industrials to this day.

Since the beginning of the year we see two averages that have indeed moved more or less in tandem: early highs were corrected in March, and a major rally in April peaked in mid-May for both averages. The averages, however, get interesting in June. The transports, which are often thought of as the leading average in the pair, corrected sharply in mid-June, rallied at the beginning of July and then, after a shallow correction, rallied to retest the May highs. The industrials, on the other hand, corrected much less sharply in June (the transports' June correction also served as a test for the spring lows) and the subsequent rally has been relatively anemic, coming nowhere near close to testing the May highs. You can easily tell the difference by looking at the resistance lines drawn on the two charts: the transports chart features a horizontal resistance line, while the Industrials chart features a resistance line that is also a fairly well-established downtrend line.

What does this suggest for the Dow Industrials? On first glance, the fact that the transports are testing their May highs is bullish for the industrials, which are trading at their July high (which is below both the June and May highs for the industrials). Generally speaking, a bullish move in the transports can have some carry-over effect into the industrials. However, it is worth nothing that both the transports and the industrials are at resistance points--the transports at horizontal resistance at about 3000 and the industrials at a downtrend resistance line currently at about 10,500. Should both averages fail to penetrate resistance and head back down, then the confirmation of the averages that Dow theorists and market technicians watch for may--albeit bearishly--come to pass.



David Penn

Technical Writer for Technical Analysis of STOCKS & COMMODITIES magazine, Working-Money.com, and Traders.com Advantage.

Title: Technical Writer
Company: Technical Analysis, Inc.
Address: 4757 California Avenue SW
Seattle, WA 98116
Phone # for sales: 206 938 0570
Fax: 206 938 1307
Website: www.Traders.com
E-mail address: DPenn@traders.com

Traders' Resource Links
Charting the Stock Market: The Wyckoff Method -- Books
Working-Money.com -- Online Trading Services
Traders.com Advantage -- Online Trading Services
Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities -- Publications and Newsletters
Working Money, at Working-Money.com -- Publications and Newsletters
Traders.com Advantage -- Publications and Newsletters
Professional Traders Starter Kit -- Software

Click here for more information about our publications!


Comments or Questions? Article Usefulness
5 (most useful)
4
3
2
1 (least useful)

Comments

PRINT THIS ARTICLE





S&C Subscription/Renewal




Request Information From Our Sponsors 

DEPARTMENTS: Advertising | Editorial | Circulation | Contact Us | BY PHONE: (206) 938-0570

PTSK — The Professional Traders' Starter Kit
Home — S&C Magazine | Working Money Magazine | Traders.com Advantage | Online Store | Traders’ Resource
Add a Product to Traders’ Resource | Message Boards | Subscribe/Renew | Free Trial Issue | Article Code | Search

Copyright © 1982–2024 Technical Analysis, Inc. All rights reserved. Read our disclaimer & privacy statement.