Saying No To Drugs

04/11/06 08:15:09 AM

by David Penn

Is the market's rejection of drug stocks hinting at an opportunity in growth stocks?

Security: $DRG, PFE
Position: N/A

James Cramer, host of CNBC's most watchable program, Mad Money, is fond of pointing out that when it comes to Wall Street, "growth is like crack." And we're not talking about the kind that "breaks your momma's back," either. No, Cramer is referring to the capacity of companies to grow: grow their revenues, grow their earnings. Almost all else can be forgiven a company — poor Wall Street relations, insider selling, creative accounting — if that company can say that at the end of the day, it is bringing the Big G.

FIGURE 1: AMEX PHARMACEUTICAL INDEX, WEEKLY. After rallying strongly from a mid-2002 bottom, pharmaceutical stocks have been range-bound since mid-2003.

Graphic provided by: Prophet Financial, Inc.

There are a number of ways for speculators and investors to take this. One approach is to focus on not just those stocks and those sectors that are suspected of providing Growth. Of course, if it were that simple, then a stockpicker's work would last all of a few minutes. How do we know if we are in a stock environment that is conducive to Growth -- or, rather, to investor appreciation of Growth? After all, some companies report great growth and great earnings and still get clobbered by the market. Other companies warn of lackluster performance and minimal growth and are rewarded with buyers ignoring those facts.

One way to profit from the Growth theme is to look at those sectors that are Growth-agnostic. By "growth-agnostic," I am referring to those stocks and sectors whose fortunes are less tied to growth and more linked to stability and safety. While utilities stocks have historically performed this function, it is also true that pharmaceutical stocks have been chosen as a haven of sorts by many investors. True, there have been eras of growth that drug stocks have enjoyed over the past few decades. But increasingly, it is a combination of healthy dividends and a sense that the demand for life-saving/life-enhancing potions will at least remain constant over the next several years that are the major attractions for those looking to make purchases among the pharmaceutical stocks.

FIGURE 2: PFIZER, DAILY. Shares of PFE look vulnerable to a classic 1-2-3 trend reversal as a trendline break in mid-February leads to a failed rally in March and a breakdown below the trendline break lows in early April.

Graphic provided by: Prophet Financial, Inc.

As Figure 1 shows, pharmaceutical stocks have traded in a wide range for most of the past few years. At or near the 340 level (basis $DRG), these stocks have tended to find resistance, and at or near the 300 level, these stocks have tended to find support. Although it is a bit difficult to see in the weekly chart in Figure 1, drug stocks were once again approaching that upside resistance zone in the spring of 2006 -- a resistance zone that may just as well be appreciated by the chart of leading drug-maker Pfizer (PFE) shown in Figure 2.

PFE, as one might expect, ran into trouble at precisely the same time as the broader index of drug stocks ($DRG) indicated it might. For Pfizer, its meeting with sector-wide resistance appears to have arrived courtesy of a 1-2-3 trend reversal. The trend that is being reversed -- or that appears to be reversed -- is the one that connects the lows of December 2005 with the last low in early February before the high (which, incidentally, takes the form of a shooting star top) mere days later. This trend was broken a few days after the shooting star top. This initial, post-trendline break low, provided the (1) of the 1-2-3 trend reversal setup and a subsequent close below this level -- the (3) in the setup -- would be a signal that PFE was ready to head lower. The middle step -- the (2) in the setup -- refers to the attempt by bulls to push PFE higher after the initial break. That effort took place in late February and again just after mid-March (recall that a short-term bottom occurred in a number of stocks and sectors just before mid-March). This effort clearly appears to have failed, leading to the violation of the February lows by the end of March and going into April.

David Penn

Technical Writer for Technical Analysis of STOCKS & COMMODITIES magazine, Working-Money.com, and Traders.com Advantage.

Title:	Technical Writer
Company:	Technical Analysis, Inc.
Address:	4757 California Avenue SW
	Seattle, WA 98116
Phone # for sales:	206 938 0570
Fax:	206 938 1307
Website:	www.Traders.com
E-mail address:	DPenn@traders.com
Traders' Resource Links
Charting the Stock Market: The Wyckoff Method -- Books
Working-Money.com -- Online Trading Services
Traders.com Advantage -- Online Trading Services
Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities -- Publications and Newsletters
Working Money, at Working-Money.com -- Publications and Newsletters
Traders.com Advantage -- Publications and Newsletters
Professional Traders Starter Kit -- Software

Click here for more information about our publications!

Comments

Date:�04/11/06Rank:�3Comment:�

Date:�04/12/06Rank:�5Comment:�

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

Request Information From Our Sponsors

DEPARTMENTS: Advertising | Editorial | Circulation | Contact Us | BY PHONE: (206) 938-0570

Comments or Questions?	Article Usefulness
	5 (most useful) 4 3 2 1 (least useful)

REVERSAL

Saying No To Drugs

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER!

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE
EMAIL NEWSLETTER!