Working Money magazine.  The investors' magazine.
Traders.com Advantage

INDICATORS LIST


LIST OF TOPICS





Article Archive | Search | Subscribe/Renew | Login | Free Trial | Forgot ID?


PRINT THIS ARTICLE

REVERSAL


Is Intel Setting Up For Another Leg Down?

09/23/04 12:15:40 PM
by David Penn

Follow-through to the downside in this leading semiconductor stock could mean an especially bearish October for Intel.

Security:   INTC
Position:   N/A

The last time shares of Intel (INTC) close above their 20-day exponential moving average on one day, then closed beneath their 20-day exponential moving average the next day, Intel subsequently lost more than 16% of its value in about 23 trading days (or, roughly, one trading month). Why might that be relevant?

Because on Tuesday, September 21st Intel closed above its 20-day EMA and today -- Wednesday, September 22nd -- Intel closed below that same exponential moving average.

Could the move below the 20-day EMA in September be signaling the same sort of continued correction that the move below the 20-day EMA did in early August?
Graphic provided by: Prophet Financial Systems, Inc.
 
Volume as Intel closed beneath the 20-day EMA was not overwhelming. But it wasn't overwhelming when Intel broke down in early August, either. In fact, Intel continued to trend down on average volume until it finally fell to the $20 level, when a spike in volume helped signal the end of the trend -- however temporary that end may turn out to be.

One problem about this bottom -- a problem that might underscore its temporariness -- is that it did not occur with a stochastic positive divergence. Bottoms can form in the absence of positive divergences in stochastics and other oscillators. But taking Intel in context, it is important to consider not only the downtrend that has characterized Intel's performance in recent months, but also the resistance currently provided by the 20-day EMA.

Not shown here is the SMH or semiconductors HOLDRS, which has a chart that looks strikingly like Intel's. One difference is that SMH has met with resistance at its 50-day -- as opposed to its 20-day -- exponential moving average. While this might be relatively (and arguably) more bullish, another feature that SMH has that Intel does not is a negative stochastic divergence between its higher price peaks of September 14 and September 21, and its lower stochastic peaks of the same dates.

Any significant follow-through to the downside in Intel will likely be a green light for those looking for opportunities on the short side. In particular, $20.10 is the level I will be most closely watching for evidence of downside follow-through.




David Penn

Technical Writer for Technical Analysis of STOCKS & COMMODITIES magazine, Working-Money.com, and Traders.com Advantage.

Title: Technical Writer
Company: Technical Analysis, Inc.
Address: 4757 California Avenue SW
Seattle, WA 98116
Phone # for sales: 206 938 0570
Fax: 206 938 1307
Website: www.Traders.com
E-mail address: DPenn@traders.com

Traders' Resource Links
Charting the Stock Market: The Wyckoff Method -- Books
Working-Money.com -- Online Trading Services
Traders.com Advantage -- Online Trading Services
Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities -- Publications and Newsletters
Working Money, at Working-Money.com -- Publications and Newsletters
Traders.com Advantage -- Publications and Newsletters
Professional Traders Starter Kit -- Software

Click here for more information about our publications!


Comments or Questions? Article Usefulness
5 (most useful)
4
3
2
1 (least useful)

Comments

Date: 09/24/04Rank: 4Comment: 
PRINT THIS ARTICLE





S&C Subscription/Renewal




Request Information From Our Sponsors 

DEPARTMENTS: Advertising | Editorial | Circulation | Contact Us | BY PHONE: (206) 938-0570

PTSK — The Professional Traders' Starter Kit
Home — S&C Magazine | Working Money Magazine | Traders.com Advantage | Online Store | Traders’ Resource
Add a Product to Traders’ Resource | Message Boards | Subscribe/Renew | Free Trial Issue | Article Code | Search

Copyright © 1982–2019 Technical Analysis, Inc. All rights reserved. Read our disclaimer & privacy statement.